pink is the new blue

Lifted this little tidbit from an article in the NYTimes on marketing to kids (mainly Disney princesses and the whatnot):

"...according to Jo Paoletti, an associate professor of American studies at the University of Maryland, ... when colors were first introduced to the nursery in the early part of the 20th century, pink was considered the more masculine hue, a pastel version of red. Blue, with its intimations of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, was thought to be dainty. Why or when that switched is not clear, but as late as the 1930s a significant percentage of adults in one national survey held to that split. Perhaps that’s why so many early Disney heroines — Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Wendy, Alice-in-Wonderland — are swathed in varying shades of azure. (Purple, incidentally, may be the next color to swap teams: once the realm of kings and N.F.L. players, it is fast becoming the bolder girl’s version of pink.) It wasn’t until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a key strategy of children’s marketing (recall the emergence of “ ’tween”), that pink became seemingly innate to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few years."

For something that is seemingly so obvious, so natural, this color association really hasn't been around for very long... absolutely fascinating.

Search This Blog

Footer

lifetime and ytd start = 3/1/08

<$BlogArchiveName$>
emilyfish@gmail.com